Live Blog: Salmond Gives His Evidence

Tweet Follow @Jeggit
By Jason Michael

We will leave off the comment here and publish a full blog post article on the evidence given by Mr Salmond for Monday. This has been a very long day.

16:29 Inquiry suspended for a brief recess. Mr Salmond has retired to his committee room due to the visible effects of a chest infection. He has just been asked about the Peter Murrell WhatsApp messages re pressuring the police and keeping Salmond fighting fires on many fronts. The former First Minister said – with considerable emphasis – that he is eager to answer ‘that question.’

The Crown Office has forbidden Mr Salmond from providing certain documents to the inquiry 'under pain of a criminal penalty.' In what other democracy in the world has the judiciary this level of power over the work of government. #SalmondSpeaks

— Jason Michael (@Jeggit) February 26, 2021

15:59 What is emerging in this deposition is that there are reasonable grounds to believe there was a criminal conspiracy working at the highest levels of the Scottish government against Mr Salmond. In every relevant question and response we have seen the government’s obfuscation and unwillingness to disclose vital facts and documents – even to its own legal council – ahead of a trial that may have resulted in the imprisonment of a former First Minister. From start to end it is evident that this was motivated by ‘political reasons.’

15:48 The Scottish government was so concerned with concealing the evidence that it kept disclosure even from its own council. The government’s council then determined, on discovering this concealment, that the case was ‘unstateable.’

📰 "The description that's most commonly made in the press about the @ScotGov policy is, 'Botched'." .. "The policy wasn't botched. The policy was, 'unlawful, unfair and tainted by apparent bias' – 'botched' doesn't cover it."
–– @AlexSalmond #SalmondSpeaks pic.twitter.com/KKGUmaLtV6

— Scotland Speaks (@ScotlandSpeaks) February 26, 2021

15:00 Just before the break Murdo Fraser asked the question: If the Crown Prosecution Service in England had asked a committee of the Westminster parliament to redact certain of its report, what would be the response? Mr Salmond, having experience in the Commons, answered that that would not happen in the London parliament. There is a clear separation of the powers between the legislature and the judiciary, but uniquely in Scotland that has not applied in the Scottish government’s treatment of this inquiry.

14:16 Jackie Bailie has put a laser sharp focus on the remit itself. Now we are talking about the criminal nature of the leak of the government report to the unionist Daily Record newspaper. Mr Salmond points out that this was a politically motivated leak and that the police noted that the First Minister was one of the interested parties who had access to the report.

Remember: Long before this went to court, someone in the Scottish government leaked an entire report to the *unionist* Daily Record. Just bear that in mind. #SalmondSpeaks

'This was a criminal leak.'

— Jason Michael (@Jeggit) February 26, 2021

13:51 Any mention of the remit of the inquiry – the breaches of the Ministerial Code – is conspicuous now only by its absence. It is clear from almost every question from the members that this session is about putting Alex Salmond back on trial. The convener has repeatedly reminded MSPs to stick to the purpose of the inquiry, but this has been roundly ignored.

The inquisitors are determined not to stick to the remit of the inquiry. Here's Maureen Watt on the 'Me Too' insinuation – already dealt with and dismissed by the court. #SalmondSpeaks pic.twitter.com/ZpcYw65gbc

— Jason Michael (@Jeggit) February 26, 2021

13:18 Rt. Hon. Alex Salmond maintains that the government process did not follow best practice. There was no consultation with the trade unions, those tasked with addressing the issues were ‘hardly experts,’ and it was not dealt with at first informally, according to the Fairness at Work policy.

13:06 At the informal stage, says Mr Salmond, there had been no complaints and nothing as far as he knew had been reported to Nicola Sturgeon the First Minister. The formal mediation process was not conducted according the the established norms agreed upon by the trade unions.

#SalmondSpeaks The legal statement from Alex Salmond. These are the constraints on his freedom to tell the truth. pic.twitter.com/MxDxPeOMhC

— Jason Michael (@Jeggit) February 26, 2021

12:46 The former First Minister has concluded his opening statement. He has stated in the strongest terms that evidence has been deliberately suppressed by the Scottish government with the complicity of the Crown Office. He has said that a great deal of time and money has been squandered in the efforts of the leadership of the government to hide this evidence. Scotland, has not failed, he says – it’s leadership has.

12:35 Alex Salmond has opened by stating that this inquiry is not about him, but about the action of others. He has pointed again at the illegality of the Scottish government’s actions and the complicity of the Crown Office. He says that he does not have a case to prove – that case have been proved in two court cases.

12:20 AT LONG LAST, after having his innocence upheld in the Scottish courts, Alex Salmond, the former leader of the Scottish National Party and First Minister of Scotland, gets his day in parliament. Here at the Random Public Journal we will be following the events in Holyrood live and reporting things as they happen. This promises to be an exciting day in Scottish politics, and – as some commenters have suggested – what is revealed today might just be the game changer we have been looking for. So, let’s buckle up!

---

Follow @Jeggit