By Jason Michael

BRITAIN’S PRIME MINISTER, Boris Johnson, last night put the people of the United Kingdom on lockdown, introducing a sweeping set of measures and restrictions on the population designed to limit the spread of the COVID-19 virus. These measures, unprecedented outside of wartime, are to be welcomed and are entirely urgent and necessary, but it simply cannot go unsaid that these steps have come late – and perhaps too late to avoid a catastrophic loss of life across Britain and the north of Ireland. Yet, in his address Mr Johnson was at pains to convey that this lockdown is consistent with the approach ‘the UK has been taking.’ This is not true. This is not the approach the British government has been taking, in spite of early warnings from the Chinese government, the actions of other European states, and the sharp criticism of the World Health Organization.

Mr Johnson, who on the 3 March downplayed the dangers; saying ‘we already have a fantastic NHS,’ finally acknowledged that there ‘will come a moment when no health service in the world could possibly cope.’ The National Health Service in England, despite the wonderful commitment of its dedicated doctors and nurses, is far from fantastic. Over a decade of austerity cuts have utterly crippled the British health service. Writing for the New Statesman in January 2018, George Eaton reported:

Since 1950, health expenditure has grown at an average annual rate of 4 per cent; over the last parliament it rose by an average of just 0.5 per cent. An ageing population, the rising cost of drugs and technology and the growth of chronic conditions, such as obesity and diabetes, all mean that the NHS depends on above-inflation increases. The £4.5bn cut to social care funding has only intensified the pressure on the service (with the NHS acting as a provider of last resort).

Much like its tired Spirit of the Blitz propaganda – used for everything from international soccer fixtures to European politics, London’s mantra of a fantastic NHS is nothing more than hot air. In Scotland, the NHS is doing better, but even this is the result of increasing mitigation by a Scottish government faced with continuing cuts from the Westminster regime. The cold, hard truth is that the NHS is not fantastic. It is creaking and growing under the pressure of ordinary and routine demands. No NHS in the UK is in a fit condition to meet the challenge of a pandemic poised as we speak to claim the lives of millions around the world and comprehensively wreck the global economy.

On 3 March, days before Italy announced a nationwide lockdown, 32 days after the first case of the virus in the UK, and two weeks after the Chinese President, Xi Jinping, personally alerted Mr Johnson of the danger, the message of the British government – on the advice of its ‘world-leading scientific experts’ – was that ‘the vast majority of the people of this country … should be going about [their] business as usual.’ He was saying this live to the British public after seventy-nine people had died in Italy and as ten towns in Lombardy were already under lockdown. All over Europe – including the UK and Ireland – confirmed cases of the novel coronavirus were mushrooming, and the official advice of the British government was ‘business as usual!’

Sure, Downing Street was taking some advice from the Chinese government. Mr Johnson wasn’t interested in the actions the PR China had taken to control the outbreak. He and his ‘world-leading scientific experts’ were only interested in the numbers – numbers which could be used in the UK to downplay the danger and keep a usually ill-informed British public ignorant. Professor Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer, said:

We are reasonably confident that, overall, probably around one percent of people who get this virus might end up dying based on the Chinese experience. Now, to be clear, what that therefore means is ninety-nine percent of people will not.

Great news for the ninety-nine percent! Johnson and his experts had clearly done some statistical gymnastics and selective reading of the available data. China, like South Korea, Japan, and Vietnam, was the wrong place from which to predict a ‘reasonably confident’ forecast for the UK’s expected death rate from the virus. China and other far-eastern and south-east Asian countries have been through this before. Experience and a developed social discipline act to protect them in ways that we in western Europe are not protected. Social distancing, the wearing of masks by the public, and good personal and public hygiene are second nature in China’s large urban centres during epidemics. Moreover, the People’s Republic of China – a totalitarian dictatorship – can quickly deploy repressive measures of population control our democracies cannot. Expecting a one percent mortality rate in the United Kingdom was always a fantasy – and the British government knew it.

A whole week before Boris Johnson told the British public it was business as usual, the Director-General of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, had reported that ‘globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died.’ In an article dated 3 March, the day Johnson told the people of the UK to go about their business as usual, CNBC reported:

The World Health Organization had said last week that the mortality rate of COVID-19 can differ, ranging from 0.7% to up to 4%, depending on the quality of the health-care system where it’s treated. Early in the outbreak, scientists had concluded the death rate was around 2.3%.

In no reality was the British NHS a healthcare system capable of dealing with a surge any better than Italy’s, Iran’s, France’s, Germany’s, Belgium’s, Ireland’s, or Spain’s healthcare systems. And in full knowledge of these limitations Britain went about its business as usual; not closing schools, pubs, and restaurants, and not ensuring people were properly informed. As its neighbour Ireland cancelled its rugby match with Italy and closed down its schools, colleges, universities, and childcare facilities, the British government was still preaching a gospel of ‘herd immunity’ from a virus for which there was no human immunity, no vaccine, and no effective treatment. And it did this knowing the British healthcare systems did not have enough ventilators, intensive care beds, protective equipment, doctors, and nurses. It was a fully informed and wilful suicide mission into which it had locked the people of England, Scotland, Wales, and the north of Ireland.

But why? Guardian headline (22 March): ‘No 10 denies claim Dominic Cummings argued to “let old people die.”’ Well, of course Downing Street is going to deny this, and without a smoking gun we are forced to presume innocence, but it isn’t exactly as though this social Darwinist thinking is foreign to the British Conservative biosphere at the bottom of the moral pond. On the 3 March The Telegraph newspaper published an article by Jeremy Warner in which he suggested ‘COVID-19 might even prove mildly beneficial in the long term by disproportionately culling elderly dependents.’ This callous reasoning was being mainstreamed by the British Conservative Press, and given that the British government’s overriding concern from the beginning of the crisis has been the health of the economy over and against the health of people – especially those considered to be economic dead weight, there is no reason to think this was not also the opinion of Dominic Cummings and indeed the Prime Minister himself.

Of course, we cannot be absolutely sure, and, given the gravity of this situation, we should be prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt. But it remains, the best indication of present and future motives are past actions, and the British Conservatives hardly have a glowing record. The evidence of its behaviour, especially in the face of the warnings from other countries and the criticism of the WHO, is accumulative. Applying Ockham’s razor, the simplest explanation is that Boris Johnson was aware of the consequences of his original course of action. It was as sick as the staff manning the bars at the Cheltenham Festival. Knowing the dire consequences, he picked his ‘experts’ – experts who would take another direction from the whole of the rest of the world – to give him the answers he and his government wanted. The plan, one might assume, was to streamline Britain and set it on an economically healthier course for a new global Britain.

But let us be absolutely clear on one thing, no matter what he has said in his latest panicked announcement, neither Boris Johnson nor the British government have been on this track from the beginning. In fact, they are extremely late to the party. Our hope – and it is a sincere hope – is that these measures will be enough, but the greatest likelihood is that the gate has been closed long after the horse has bolted. People were always going to die of this virus. There is no way to stop a virus. But Boris Johnson has by his wilful inaction and arrogance set Britain up to fail – and fail bad. It is now likely, though hopefully not certain, that many, many more people will die in the UK than ever needed to. And, no matter what is said or done, this is all on the British government.


Boris Johnson announces strict new curbs on life in UK

032 001


16 thoughts on “Boris Johnson’s Cull

  1. The most Dangerous leader of the most dangerous party in British politics right now..they’re in charge! .. We’re pretty much fucked for the foreseeable..if you get to live that long..

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Jason

    People are falling for the dummy and missing the real story

    It is not what any leader says now. It is only their actions that matter and even more important what are the ramifications inherent in each government’s approach.
    – Is the burden shared?
    – Is the government deploying all the leavers of government to assist the public?
    – Is the control still using the normal range of state powers?
    – Can you see what it looks like on the other side as anything approaching normal where everyone was equally invested in the effort?

    Singapore / China model – all in it together – Clear actions to control the spread and share the burden. The state will look relatively as before on the other side of this.

    UK / Australia model – despite the random government noises of action (delivered too late), The burden is pushed on the public and we can already see the gas lighting about the public not doing enough when the government’s message is both brain-numbingly inconsistent and constantly changing. It has a whiff of herd immunity with the edges knocked off where the government will knee jerk a very dark response if the shite really hits the fan.
    USA – this one is frightening and not just for America. The Whitehouse have now made their choice and they are going to let it run. Except their approach is not herd immunity, it is way darker. Their triage rationing will be done via ability to pay and very quickly I suspect we will see those who are poor will not be given access to the same hospitals or HCW who treat the well off.

    The issue for all of in the US’s sphere of influence is not how their massively armed population responds to widespread fatalities and unemployment. It is that Whitehouse and security apparatus will have already strategised this possibility. Meaning that by choosing to allowing the disease to run, they have signalled they are already willing/planning to suppress any backlash. Watch out – because I fear that response will be the excuse for other “democracies” to follow suit.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. And, when this pandemic is all over, BJ, DC, MG, and the rest of the CONservative party, will claim a victory, that they rallied the people and, they’ll give great praise to the Dunkirk spirit and also to our NHS for their hard work. Pity that they let it happen in the first place with their lack of positive action.


  4. I heard Boris Johnson say in a TV interview something like, “Let’s take it on the chin.” He said that lots of old people will die. He welcomed their death. That is the spirit of Capitalism. The economy, which really means the finances of the wealthy, is what’s important. The health and life of poor people are expendable.


  5. Absolutely disgusted with the government
    I am 76 years of age and I have worked since 1953 and as of last week I was still in full time employment sadly I am one if the people who voted for Conservatives until
    Mrs Mrs May was elected in, thank god i
    never I never voted for Boris Johnson or her. They have trashed our NHS and our reputation worldwide.


  6. Excellent piece. There is always an agenda with government policy and actions. It’s clear the welfare of the UK was not the agenda in this circumstance. Once this is over people will want to move on and forget. We must not forget. Or forgive.


  7. Jason

    I wrote previously that it would be a race to see if governments could manipulate the new media barrage to overwhelm us or the public would learn new tools to hold them to account.

    I had not picked how quickly Governments appear to have learnt that between elections (with a compliant media) no one can/will hold them to account for any folly. This sets up the conditions for very authoritarian knee jerk responses after letting it fall into a pile of shite….actually the press and their supports will demand it.

    It is almost as if this is the new learnt behaviour if your government wants more power:
    1 Let it go to shite,
    2 Blame the public,
    3 Only way to solve it is a crackdown (with new powers)
    4 Shout loudly and repeatedly “we saved you”. (powers remain)

    Westminster’s Covid-19 response is the entire 30year EuroSceptic/Brexit arc condensed into 3 months. BJ and the press are starting to call for number 3 in that list.

    Sadly in the race between govt power and public holding them to account, I think they are winning.


  8. I thought BarrheadBoy encapsulated the USA in a nutshell.
    He said:
    The Americans may have enough of a nuclear arsenal to wipe out the entire planet 10 times over however they do not have enough face masks to protect their first responders to the virus. There is a moral in there somewhere.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Reference STOP playing by their rules , today the WM ENHS leader announced from next week there would be testing available for NHS frontline staff FFS NEXT week , then NS announces the same thing , HEALTH is DEVOLVED why are we WAITING on these despicable tory corrupt governments who have DEVASTATED the NHS to pretend to make moves to protect frontline staff then NS and her fellow capitulators and royal apologists decide oh yes we better do the same

    Why is the FM of Scotland who has been elected to SERVE and PROTECT the citizens of Scotland waiting to find out what the bozo clown crew are doing before following suit .
    Our SNHS personnel have to be applauded and revered for their unstinting devotion to duty and their commitment to Scottish citizens why is our FM not taking command of the situation rather than following the example and moves of NHS hating tories


  10. Johnson and his government knew people would die with the policy of non containment. They knew it would predominately be the old, who the cynically were prepared to sacrifice trying to protect the economy.

    Callous in the calculation, and murderous in their action telling people that they were well prepared for virus, when they were absolutely not, whilst all the while encouraging the virus to spread and spread widely, has proved to be absolutely ruinous.

    Johnson and his backers bet the house on a callous murderous plan and they have lost. The economy is in ruins. Output has crashed by 35% according to reports in the financial paper. There is no vaccine, the virus is now out there widely spread,, the herd immunity has not materialised, and unlike other countries who controlled the virus and are relaxing lockdown and going back to work, the U.K. stumbles on burying its dead.

    Ireland was once the poor plague ravished nation on the doorstep of Britain but now it looks like Britain will be the poor plague ravished nation on the doorstep of the EU.

    With germ warfare as it was called very much more thoroughly researched weapon I suspect we can look forward to more of this in the future. This may only have been the dummy run.


  11. And yes, as a dummy run, COVID 19 is a sunny walk in the park compared to some of the biological weapons that have been created over recent years.

    And would they be used.

    Well in the 1760s the British colonists used gifts small pox infected blankets to quell rebellious native Indian tribes when colonising North America .

    And a hundred years later Ireland lost over a million souls in the 1845 to 1849 potato blight whilst the country actually exported food back to Britain.

    And then in the 1940s the RAF experimented bombing sheep on the Scottish west coast island of Gruinard with Anthrax spores as part of a plan to bomb German cities. Thankfully Churchill did not get his way since research as now revealed that such an attack would have created a holocaust many many times worse than nuclear weapons.

    And today, who will be the winner, in what may be the first of a new warfare. Or is this a conspiracy too far.


Please Share Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s