By Jason Michael

THINGS ARE LOOKING UP. At long last, Nicola Sturgeon, the First Minister of Scotland, has commented on a timeframe for another independence referendum. Responding to a question from the leader of the Scottish Greens, Patrick Harvie MSP, Ms Sturgeon said that it is now her intention to inform the Scottish parliament on the timing of a referendum in the next couple of weeks, and she added that this would not be derailed in the event that Article 50 was extended. This is most welcome news indeed, but – fantastic thought it is – we must be cautioned not to lose the run of ourselves just yet. This is not our first rodeo. We have had announcements on this in the past. Holyrood even gave its support to another referendum – and still, somehow, we are still waiting.

Why are we waiting? The reason is, as the First Minister said before, that we are waiting to see what shape Brexit finally takes. But the issue with this reason is that it’s not entirely clear what waiting to see actually means. There is very good reason to believe that we are right now looking at the final shape of Brexit – a no-deal “crash out” for the United Kingdom from the European Union; an “Apocalypse scenario” that will see us plunged into the abyss of economic failure and food shortages. Unless there is an extension to the Article 50 process, this certainly looks to be the shape of Brexit. But there is another interpretation: That we allow ourselves to be Brexited along with the rest of the UK to get a feel for the reality of Brexit.

There is no shortage of voices in the independence movement advocating this latter reading of the SNP’s wait-and-see policy; an insane belief that once No-voters of 2014 and unionists feel the pinch of Britain’s biggest mistake in history they will come over to independence. It cannot be stressed enough how bad an idea this is. We all accept that Brexit will be a catastrophe for the UK. No one seriously doubts – not even the majority of Brexiteers – that it will have a serious and deeply negative effect on our economy, one from which, as Jacob Rees-Mogg has conceded, it will take the state half a century to recover. If this is true for the UK – even a UK in control of Scotland’s resources, then how can anyone think this dire prediction will not also be true for us?

Leaving the EU under these conditions is an act of state suicide. Scotland gaining independence after Brexit, if that is even possible, is no less an act of state suicide. But more importantly, and as has previously and repeatedly been said, winning independence after Brexit – in what will be a period of chronic economic peril for the British state – will be near impossible. The UK’s survival will depend on its ability to control Scotland’s oil and gas, and we know what Britain is prepared to do to keep its hands on others’ oil resources. Let’s be serious, on the 29 March – if Scotland is not well on the road to independence or independent already – the prospect of another referendum will become an impossibly distant one.

We are close enough to Brexit to know its final shape. One does not have to leap off the edge of the Grand Canyon to know the result won’t be entirely good. Scotland is right on the cliff edge and we can all see, as clear as the noses on our faces, that continuing on any further will be the death of Scotland’s democracy and the end of the independence cause for decades. Yet, there are still many who think this a good idea – and we have nothing to suggest that this is not the current best idea circulating around the highest offices of the Scottish government. What we have seen to this point is a willingness on the part of the Scottish government to follow the process – an endless Kafkaesque and bureaucratic process laid out by the desk jockeys of Whitehall and Westminster. It is easy to imagine the Scottish government filling out form A-29486-23 (subsection B-373) as it tips over the edge. Bureaucratic states, such as the UK is, can make these processes endless.

An announcement that an announcement is coming is, however, a welcome development. It is a relief. For too long the independence cause has been bogged down in a waiting game. The movement on the ground has gone stir-crazy, and things aren’t exactly much better up the political chain. At Westminster our SNP MPs – a good few of them at any rate – have splashed out on all the People’s Vote merchandise in the vain hope that being a team player for the benefit of Remain England – the minority of the English electorate – will improve our chances on bettering Scotland. The People’s Vote campaign is a pro-Brexit campaign. It’s not about cancelling Brexit. It’s about giving English voters – who voted Leave – the choice of the door or the window. These Scottish MPs seem to have completely forgotten that Scotland voted Remain – and not be a small margin either.

Brexit is happening. Be it on 29 March 2019 or 29 March 2020, Brexit is happening. The people of Scotland rejected Brexit, and the only way now for us to get what we voted for is to leave the UK and become an independent state. All that should be concerning us – our SNP MSPs and MPs and the whole movement – is the when of independence; before or after Brexit. If that is after Brexit, then forget it – that’s not going to happen! So, let me rephrase that: All that should be concerning us is securing independence before Brexit. We don’t have long to do that. So this coming announcement should come sooner rather than later and it can only say one thing – independence now!


How to Cope With Bureaucracy

032 001

7 thoughts on “An Announcement is Imminent

  1. Absolute common sense, simple as that., However ,even if this happens we will start a campaign with one hand tied behind our back as there has been no preparation or addressing of the issues we lost the last referendum on, unless you call the economic commission, preparation, but that was a waste of time. There must be urgent attention to these issues such as currency or we are wasting our time.


  2. Currency can be reasonably solved as explained in the below.

    The three phases of moving away from the UK pound to an independent currency. It has to be an independent currency and here’s why.

    Between voting for independence and independence day, we continue to use pound sterling. After independence day we switch to an informal arrangement of sterling during the transition period while we build our national bank and cash reserves. Once that’s done, we switch permanently to an independent currency.

    It’s a three-step plan. The currency we will be using eventually will be an independent one.

    We don’t want to be using the pound in currency union because WM will have all the power. We can’t use the Euro because to do that you need to have an independent currency first then enter that currency into the Exchange rate mechanism for 2 years minimum before switching to the Euro. We’re not going to build an independent currency and all the billions that entails to then switch to the euro. As for informal sterling use for a long period, well that wouldn’t be a good idea because then Westminster would set interest rate (Bank of England). So it has to be an independent currency. There’s no other option. Which is great, because now when unionists ask we can tell them – An independent currency, phased in over the three-phase plan below.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Nicola is a lawyer by education and practice.
    Cross the Ts and dot the Is.

    Hoever I cannot but think (hope) that she has a plan for the clusterfuck of No Deal.
    May is in full Bunker mentality dealing in crises by the hour and added impossibility of a completely new front with the rebellious Scots swarming South taking with them the booty of 300 years as part repayment.

    She is, in my opinion quite able to take a Spanish / Catalan position and try to hold down Scotland by force. There doesn’t seem to be anybody in England capable of stopping her that she wouldn’t kneecap. That includes her own side.

    We leave and the Financial World will fall in on England the difference between a £ and a € could become a €.
    I am pessimistic aboutthe future and feel your best position would be to stay safe in the Republic.
    Things could get very ugly.

    Until then, there is red wine.


  4. Too many risks in waiting as you outline.
    I don’t even now agree with another referendum.
    Patrick Harvie is right we need action.
    He could drive the way as I now think the Greens are more for Independence than the SNP.
    Nicola and others at the top are playing to safe now.
    I think they should use the double mandate they have a d just dissolve the union by letter to the PM.
    Done and dusted that way, as it will take 2years to unshackle us from UK anyway.


  5. We cannot wait until after Brexit, absolutely agree. I worry about another Referendum after watching the dirty tricks used in 2014 by the media and Tory/Labour. Also, a lot of people still believe what they read in the newspapers all biased against Independence (except the National). Far better to dissolve the Union by letter, have the present Government not breached the Union countless time? The Withdrawal Agreement treats Ireland differently from Scotland, is this not a total breach of the Union? We need to act before 29 March.


Leave a Reply to JSM Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s